Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2013 (10) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....elled. From the averments made in the Writ Petition, it appears that for the year 2012-13, the petitioner was having licence under the aforesaid provisions for retail sale of Foreign Liquor (excluding Beer and Wine). By the impugned Order dated 3rd November, 2012, the said licence has been cancelled by the Collector/Licensing Authority, Firozabad in exercise of his powers under Section 34(2) of the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 read with the relevant provisions of the aforesaid Rules, particularly Rule 18(2) thereof. We have heard Sri S.N. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3 has raised a prelimina....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... aggrieved person within thirty days from the date of communication of such order, and unless the appellant has furnished satisfactory proof of having paid a sum of not less than 25 per cent of the disputed amount of tax, fee, penalty or other dues, if any, as the case may be; Provided further that the appellate authority may, for special and adequate reasons to be recorded in writing, waive or relax the requirements of the preceding proviso in respect of such disputed amount of tax,fees, penalty or other dues. (2) The State Government may either suo motu or on an application by an aggrieved person call for and examine the records relating to any order passed in any proceeding under this Act, for the purposes of satisfying itself as to th....