https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237729 A writ petition challenging cancellation of an excise licence was not entertained because the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 provided a statutory appeal to the Excise Commissioner against the Collector's order, followed by revision to the State Government after the appeal had been disposed of. The HC held that the impugned cancellation was amenable to that appellate remedy and, given the nature of the dispute, the petitioner had to pursue the statutory forum instead of invoking Article 226 jurisdiction. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the alternative remedy under the Act. en-us Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237729 A writ petition challenging cancellation of an excise licence was not entertained because the U.P. Excise Act, 1910 provided a statutory appeal to the Excise Commissioner against the Collector's order, followed by revision to the State Government after the appeal had been disposed of. The HC held that the impugned cancellation was amenable to that appellate remedy and, given the nature of the dispute, the petitioner had to pursue the statutory forum instead of invoking Article 226 jurisdiction. The petitioner was therefore relegated to the alternative remedy under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=237729