2013 (6) TMI 645

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... and collected an amount from M/s. Tata Project Ltd. During the course of audit the revenue authorities found this and noticed that the appellant has not deposited the service tax collected by him from M/s. Tata Project Ltd. into the government treasury. Show cause notice was issued. The appellant contesting the show cause notice on merits. The adjudicating authority after following the due process of law confirmed the demand of service tax of Rs.7,40,996/- along with interest and also imposed penalties under Section 76 & Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1944. Aggrieved by such an order, the appellant preferred an appeal before the first appellate authority. The first appellate authority after following the principles of natural justice, came....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his submission that the assessee was knowing that they are liable to pay the service tax on the said services and hence collected the same from their clients but did not pay to the Government of India. It is his submission that the penalties imposed under Section 76 & Section 78 are liable to be imposed on the appellant. 5. On careful consideration of the submissions made by both sides, I find that the first appellate authority in this case has come to a conclusion that the appellant has rendered the services which are taxable only in respect of one invoice i.e. invoice No.VN/295/A/CP dated 29.09.04 and has upheld the service tax liability of Rs.2,47,032/- along with interest and has upheld the penalty imposed under Section 76 & Section ....