<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 645 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234820</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding penalties imposed under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The appellant was granted the benefit of discharging 25% of the service tax as a penalty. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the specified penalty amount within thirty days to avoid further collection of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 09:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=197230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 645 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234820</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by upholding penalties imposed under Section 76 and Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1944. The appellant was granted the benefit of discharging 25% of the service tax as a penalty. The Tribunal directed the appellant to deposit the specified penalty amount within thirty days to avoid further collection of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=234820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>