TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2013 (5) TMI 505
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nsel for the petitioner. 2. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition challenging the notice issued by the respondent No. 1, published in Daily News Paper 'Dainik Bhaskar' dated 28-1-2012 (Annexure-8), whereby it was directed that if amount of service tax/penalty/interest is pending against any party/service provider, the same may be deposited within a period of seven days, failing which an act....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... along with an application for stay and the next date fixed in the case for hearing on stay application by the Tribunal is 2-4-2012. 4. Submission of the learned counsel for petitioner is that petitioner has already preferred an appeal along stay application and the next date fixed by the Tribunal for hearing on stay application is 2-4-2012, but in the meantime, notice has been issued on 28-1-201....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ervice tax/penalty/interest. The adjudicating authority has passed an order against petitioner demanding a sum of Rs. 1,64,499/- along with interest and penalty. The said order has been upheld by the Commissioner of Appeals. Petitioner has further filed an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal along with stay application and next date fixed by the Tribunal is 2-4-2012. A period of seven days was gi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....binds all Central Excise Officers to stay their hands off resorting to coercive measures of recovery during the pendency of stay petition before the CEGAT. So far as present case is concerned, it is not a case of petitioner that the said Circular dated 2-3-1990 has been brought to the notice of respondents. Further, the petitioner has neither placed on record any copy of attachment order of its mo....