https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233920 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a recovery notice for service tax/penalty/interest, directing deposit within seven days, despite an appeal pending before the Tribunal with a stay application. The Court noted the absence of property attachment or auction and advised the petitioner to seek an early hearing before the Tribunal if urgent, rather than filing the writ petition. The Court distinguished a prior judgment on the Circular prohibiting coercive recovery during appeal pendency due to lack of evidence and circumstances, ultimately dismissing the petition for lack of merit. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 May 2013 08:26:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233920 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a recovery notice for service tax/penalty/interest, directing deposit within seven days, despite an appeal pending before the Tribunal with a stay application. The Court noted the absence of property attachment or auction and advised the petitioner to seek an early hearing before the Tribunal if urgent, rather than filing the writ petition. The Court distinguished a prior judgment on the Circular prohibiting coercive recovery during appeal pendency due to lack of evidence and circumstances, ultimately dismissing the petition for lack of merit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 14 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=233920