2012 (6) TMI 14

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....JOSE JOSEPH, SC   JUDGMENT   Correctness and sustainability of Ext.P6 order passed by the second respondent imposing a condition upon the petitioner to satisfy 15% of the total alleged liability of more than '1.5 billion', inspite of the factual position admitted that the petitioner has already satisfied 60% of the demand, is sought to be intercepted in this writ petition because of th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Section 220(6) and considering the same, the petitioner was directed as per Ext.P4 order, to satisfy the balance demand in respect of the remaining 47.78 crores by way of equal monthly instalments @ Rs. 3 crores each, commencing from April 2012.   4. This made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing W.P.(C)No.8319/2012 challenging Ext.P4. After hearing both sides, the said writ peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... avail the benefit thereunder. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is every chance for allowing the appeal, for the fact that the only issue is whether the 'turn over tax' and the 'surcharge' paid by the petitioner are 'allowable deductions' or not. Since the matter is pending consideration before the second respondent, this Court does not find it fit to go into the merits of....