Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition requiring payment of an additional 15% of the demand, over and above the 60% already paid, was justified while the appeal remained pending.
Analysis: The petitioner had already satisfied 60% of the assessed liability. The appeal was still pending, and the Court declined to enter into the merits of the assessment dispute at that stage. In view of the existing payment, the pendency of the appeal, and the petitioner's status as a fully owned Government undertaking, the Court found no necessity to insist on a further 15% payment as a condition for stay.
Conclusion: The additional condition was waived and the petitioner was held entitled to absolute stay during the pendency of the appeal.