2011 (1) TMI 1118
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....S) No. 67 of 2011 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 68 of 2011 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 89 of 2011 Writ - -<br>Income Tax<br>B.S.Verma, J. Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Vashist, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Since the controversy involved in all these wri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 66 of 2011, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act dated 30-12-2010 (Annexure P-6) being illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 67 of 2011, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of cert....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act dated 30-12-2010 (Annexure P-5) being illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. The petitioners have stated that the petitioners have earlier filed a separate writ petition in each case on the same set of facts and this Court in each of the earlier writ petitions, mentioned in the memo of writ petition, has passed an interim order to the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....44C of the Income Tax Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has further contended that since the Court has formed a prima facie opinion and issued notice to the respondent on jurisdictional point on the change of opinion, this exercise would be futile since the writ petitions are pending before this Court. Rule 7 of Chapter XXII of the Rules of the Court, 1952 reads as under....


TaxTMI