Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2011 (1) TMI 1118

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....S) No. 67 of 2011 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 68 of 2011 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 89 of 2011 Writ - -<br>Income Tax<br>B.S.Verma, J. Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner. &nbsp; Mr. Arvind Vashist, Advocate, learned counsel for the respondent. &nbsp; Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. &nbsp; Since the controversy involved in all these wri....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 66 of 2011, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed under Section 144C of the Income Tax Act dated 30-12-2010 (Annexure P-6) being illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. &nbsp; In Writ Petition (M/S) No. 67 of 2011, the petitioner has sought a writ in the nature of cert....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... passed under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act dated 30-12-2010 (Annexure P-5) being illegal, unlawful and without jurisdiction. &nbsp; The petitioners have stated that the petitioners have earlier filed a separate writ petition in each case on the same set of facts and this Court in each of the earlier writ petitions, mentioned in the memo of writ petition, has passed an interim order to the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....44C of the Income Tax Act. &nbsp; Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has further contended that since the Court has formed a prima facie opinion and issued notice to the respondent on jurisdictional point on the change of opinion, this exercise would be futile since the writ petitions are pending before this Court. Rule 7 of Chapter XXII of the Rules of the Court, 1952 reads as under....