<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1118 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209628</link>
    <description>Second writ petitions founded on the same facts as earlier writ petitions were barred by the governing court rule against a second application on the same factual basis. Because the core controversy had already been raised in the prior proceedings, the later petitions could not be entertained and were liable to dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=183074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1118 - UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209628</link>
      <description>Second writ petitions founded on the same facts as earlier writ petitions were barred by the governing court rule against a second application on the same factual basis. Because the core controversy had already been raised in the prior proceedings, the later petitions could not be entertained and were liable to dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=209628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>