Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2010 (2) TMI 650

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Act, 1994 (the Act), 125/- per day u/s 76 1000/- u/s 77 2 95/08 62/2007 dtd.30.10.07 16/2006 dtd. 07.06.2006 01.04.05 to 30.09.05 32,74,870/- 32,74,870/- u/s 78 150/- per day u/s 76 1000/- u/s 77 2. Facts in brief are that the Superintendent of Central Excise, Service Tax Division, Ernakulam had gathered that the appellants, a dealer in Maruti vehicles registered as an authorized service station, were also engaged in promoting the business of (i) M/s. Maruti Insurance Brokers Ltd. (MIBL) a fully owned subsidiary of M/s. Maruti Udyog Ltd. (MUL) and (ii) grant of loans to buyers of maruti vehicles by select finance companies/ banks through M/s. Maruti Finance. MIBL is an agent for issuing insurance policies of M/s. National Insurance Co. Ltd. (NIC) to buyers of maruti vehicles. MUL had institutionalized the facilitation in respect of vehicle insurance (called maruti insurance) and loans (maruti finance) by entering into agreements with NIC and banks/finance companies respectively. MIBL received commission from NIC and MUL received commission from finance companies for the business facilitation carried out and paid applicable service tax under insurance auxiliary service (IA....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....provided under the scheme evolved by Maruti Udyog Limited was by MIBL to the National Insurance Company and in respect of the said service National Insurance Company had already paid the service tax under Rule 2(1)(d)(iii) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994, as amended. The confirmation of the demand of service tax against the appellant was therefore wholly illegal. C. The lower authorities ought to have found that merely because MIBL had paid the appellant a share of the tax suffered commission received by it from National Insurance Company as its share of the Commission received, it could not be said that the appellant was providing any taxable service to MIBL. Insofar as the appellant was not promoting or marketing any service, which was provided by MIBL, there was no justification for holding that the appellant is liable to tax under the head of business auxiliary services. D. The lower authorities ought to have found that MIBL was floated as a company solely to formulate and provide a customized insurance package for the customers of Maruti vehicles after entering into an agreement with National Insurance Company. The service provider in the whole arrangement was MIBL who was ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....loated a subsidiary company by name Maruti Insurance Brokers Ltd. which acted as an agent of National Insurance Company and provided customized maruti insurance to buyers of maruti vehicles. MIBL acted as an insurance agent for selling insurance policy of NIC to the customers of maruti vehicles; NIC paid commission to MIBL for the service (IAS) it rendered. MIBL discharged service tax on the above commission received from NIC under the heading "Insurance Auxiliary Services" (IAS). MIBL paid a commission to the dealer who sold the vehicle and facilitated sale of insurance policy to the buyer. At the dealer's end, the paper work in connection with the insurance policy would be undertaken by the dealer himself and forwarded directly to NIC. 5.1. MUL had devised a concept known as maruti finance whereby MUL would liaise with the buyers of maruti vehicles and introduce the said buyers to select finance companies for arranging loan for purchase of vehicles by such finance companies. The arrangement to this effect had been entered into between MUL and the bank/finance company concerned. For the introductory service of MUL, the finance company concerned would pay MUL, certain amount as co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ot liable to pay service tax under BAS. The penalty imposed was not justified, since there was no positive act of suppression or willful misstatement justifying the invocation of the penal provision against the appellant company. We find that the impugned demands have been raised under the head BAS. The relevant part of the entry BAS reads as follows: 'Business Auxiliary Service' means any service in relation to "Promotion or marketing or sale of goods Produced by the client Provided by the client Belonging to the Client Promotion or marketing of service provided by the client (including promoting and marketing game of chance) Any customer care service provided on behalf of the client; or Procurement of goods or services, which are inputs (all goods or services that are intended for use) for the client or Production or processing of goods for or on behalf the client; or Provision of service on behalf of the client; or A service incidental or auxiliary to any activity specified in the above clauses such as Billing, Issue or collection or recovery of cheques, Payments, Maintenance of accounts and remittance, Inventory management, Evaluation or development of pro....