<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 650 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203639</link>
    <description>The CESTAT, Bangalore held that a dealer receiving a share of commission from an intermediary who had already discharged service tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service was not liable to pay service tax again. The intermediary (MUL) received commission from finance companies for vehicle sales and insurance facilitation, paid service tax on the entire amount, then shared a portion with the dealer. The tribunal ruled that once service tax was discharged on the commission by the intermediary, the dealer receiving the shared amount was not liable for additional service tax under BAS, setting aside the demand order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 08:40:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=177195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 650 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203639</link>
      <description>The CESTAT, Bangalore held that a dealer receiving a share of commission from an intermediary who had already discharged service tax liability under Business Auxiliary Service was not liable to pay service tax again. The intermediary (MUL) received commission from finance companies for vehicle sales and insurance facilitation, paid service tax on the entire amount, then shared a portion with the dealer. The tribunal ruled that once service tax was discharged on the commission by the intermediary, the dealer receiving the shared amount was not liable for additional service tax under BAS, setting aside the demand order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=203639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>