1987 (11) TMI 348
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
..... OJHA, C.J.-Certain goods which the petitioner No. 2, N.K. Industries, claims to belong to it were being transported through the petitioner No. 1, M/s. Reliable Roadways, and were seized at a check post barrier. Ultimately, on the ground that a breach of sub-section (8) of section 29-A of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 had been committed, a penalty in the sum of Rs. 1,05,600 was imposed. It....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....is already pending against the impugned order, the petitioners should be required to pursue the said remedy and no decision in regard to the validity of the order of imposition of penalty is needed at this stage in the present writ petition. 4.. In the result, this writ petition is dismissed without going into the merits of the impugned order of penalty on the ground that the petitioners should....
TaxTMI