https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155363 Where a statutory revision against a penalty order is already pending, the writ court need not exercise its jurisdiction to examine the merits of the same order. The Madhya Pradesh High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a penalty imposed for breach of section 29-A(8) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the petitioners had already invoked the revisional remedy. The challenge was therefore left for determination by the revisional authority, and interference in writ jurisdiction was refused at that stage. en-us Sat, 28 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:33:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155363 Where a statutory revision against a penalty order is already pending, the writ court need not exercise its jurisdiction to examine the merits of the same order. The Madhya Pradesh High Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a penalty imposed for breach of section 29-A(8) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958, because the petitioners had already invoked the revisional remedy. The challenge was therefore left for determination by the revisional authority, and interference in writ jurisdiction was refused at that stage. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Sat, 28 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=155363