Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Bars
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1982 (8) TMI 200

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e head office of the firm is at New Delhi and its factory is situated at Ghaziabad. It is engaged in the manufacture of electric wires and electric cables. For the assessment year 1975-76 the petitioners effected intra-State sales of aggregate sum of Rs. 38,27,252.19 out of which sales to the extent of Rs. 35,87,576 were made to Government departments and on those sales tax at the concessional rates of 3 per cent and 4 per cent in view of section 3-G of the U.P. Sales Tax Act was to be charged. This provision has come into force on 26th May, 1975. While filing the quarterly/monthly returns the petitioners deposited the sales tax on the sales made to the various Government departments at the rate of 7 per cent plus 1 per cent which amount ca....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndable to them for the preceding year and in regard to which their application for adjustment had been pending. It appears that without disposing of that application the petitioners were served with a notice of demand dated 1st July, 1977, requiring them to pay Rs. 92,617.25 and that notice form the subject-matter of challenge in this writ petition. No counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents and hence the averments made in the petition have to be accepted as correct. It was submitted before us on behalf of the petitioners by their counsel, Sri Bharatji Agrawal, that without adjusting the amount found refundable to the petitioners, the impugned proceedings for recovery could not be taken. In the same connection it wa....