Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of the demand could be enforced without first deciding the assessee's application for adjustment of the excess tax paid in the earlier assessment year.
Analysis: Section 29 of the Sales Tax Act requires the assessing authority to refund excess tax and, by the proviso, to first adjust the refundable amount against any tax or other amount outstanding under the Act or under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The proviso operates as a mandatory adjustment mechanism and contemplates automatic adjustment of the refund against existing liabilities. As the assessee had already paid excess tax and had applied for adjustment before recovery was sought, the authority could not proceed to enforce recovery without first disposing of that application and giving effect to the statutory adjustment.
Conclusion: Recovery could not be enforced until the application for adjustment of the excess amount was first decided, and the petitioners succeeded.