Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (10) TMI 709

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... both sides. The Revenue filed this appeal against the impugned order whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the demand of Rs. 6,71,473/- and also set aside the penalty. The Revenue demanded the duty after denying the credit on the ground that the registered dealer who supplied the raw materials to the present respondents did not actually received the raw materials as vehicle numbers mention....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... The Revenue also relied upon the facts that the respondent has paid the amount in dispute during the pendency of the investigation. 3. We find that no doubt the respondents deposited the amount during the pendency of the investigation and we find that the letter dated 19th July, 1997 under which the respondents specified that the credit was availed rightly by complying with all required formalit....