<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 709 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152229</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, which set aside a demand of duty and penalty. The dispute centered on the denial of credit to the respondents by the Revenue, alleging non-receipt of raw materials by the registered dealer. Despite the Revenue&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings based on substantial evidence provided by the respondents, confirming the receipt, utilization, and duty payment for the inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence in tax disputes and the lack of challenge to the established facts, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=169267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 709 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152229</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT KOLKATA dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) order, which set aside a demand of duty and penalty. The dispute centered on the denial of credit to the respondents by the Revenue, alleging non-receipt of raw materials by the registered dealer. Despite the Revenue&#039;s contentions, the Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s findings based on substantial evidence provided by the respondents, confirming the receipt, utilization, and duty payment for the inputs. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of evidence in tax disputes and the lack of challenge to the established facts, leading to the appeal&#039;s dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>