Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2009 (10) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....spondent. ORDER These appeals have been filed by M/s. Lanco Kondapalli Power Pvt. Ltd. (Lanco) and Shri Y. Harish Chandra Prasad, Managing Director of Lanco. After hearing both sides for some time on stay petitions filed by the applicants, we find that the appeals themselves can be disposed of without a further hearing. Accordingly, we take up the appeals proper after dispensing with the require....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under Section 125(l)of the Act. Penalty of Rs. 50 Crores was imposed on Lanco. 3. In the initial round vide Final Order No. 1616/2004 dated 18-10-2004, the order of the original authority in relation to the impugned imports was remanded to the original authority finding that the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, Kakinada had also issued a notice to the appellants in relation to the same transa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ned order is not just and legal. On this ground alone, the impugned order is to be set aside as it is not a speaking order. In view of the pleas raised by the appellants and taking into consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, we set aside the impugned order and remand the matter to the Commissioner for de novo consideration to be decided in the light of principles of Natural Just....