https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152051 Failure to examine the voluminous evidence directed in remand and repetition of the earlier adjudication order rendered the fresh decision incomplete and justified de novo reconsideration. The matter was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication after proper evaluation of all relevant material. The penalty on the managing director, being dependent on the final outcome against the company, could not be sustained while the substantive charges remained unsettled. The result was that the adjudication was reopened and the connected penalty was kept in abeyance pending final determination of the company's liability. en-us Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 22 Jun 2013 12:53:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152051 Failure to examine the voluminous evidence directed in remand and repetition of the earlier adjudication order rendered the fresh decision incomplete and justified de novo reconsideration. The matter was therefore set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication after proper evaluation of all relevant material. The penalty on the managing director, being dependent on the final outcome against the company, could not be sustained while the substantive charges remained unsettled. The result was that the adjudication was reopened and the connected penalty was kept in abeyance pending final determination of the company's liability. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=152051