2007 (3) TMI 540

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, JDR ORDER S.L. PEERAN, MEMBER (J) 1. Both these appeals raises common question of law and facts pertaining to the same assessee and hence they are taken up together for disposal as per law. By OIO No. 1/05 dated 21.4.05, the Commissioner has rejected the application filed by the appellant seeking revision of central excise duty under Rule 21 with regard to the goods dispatched to the lorry w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s under: a depot, premises of a consignment agent or any other place or premises from where the excisable goods are to be sold after their clearance from the factory. In this connection learned Counsel draws our attention to the provisions in Central Sales Tax Act. He refers to Section 5 of the Act which is noted herein below: When is a sale or purchase of goods said to take place in the cour....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... under bond, are deemed to be under overall customs control. This has been so held by the Tribunal in the case of Sangita Printers and Exporters v. CCE Allahabad 1993 (74) ELT 182 (T). He also submits that the Apex Court in the case of M.J. Exports Ltd. v. CEGAT [1992 (60) E.L.T. 161 (S.C.)] has explained the expression, for "home consumption" vis-a-vis expression "warehousing". He also refers to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... CE Act defines the "place of removal" to be read with Section 5 of the Central Excise Act. Therefore the Single Member bench ruling in the case of Ginni Filaments has no bearing in the matter. 2. Learned DR relies on the Single Member Bench ruling rendered in the case of Ginni Filaments Ltd.,. 3. We have considered the submissions and agree with learned Counsel on the legal point. The SMB in th....