Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether remission of central excise duty was available where export goods were destroyed in an accident during transportation before export, and whether such goods could be treated as removed from the factory for the purpose of duty liability.
Analysis: The goods were dispatched for export and were destroyed in an accidental lorry mishap before the export documents were presented to the Customs authorities. On that footing, the goods had not reached the stage at which the export sale could be treated as complete. The place of removal, in the context of export goods, was therefore not the factory gate but the point at which the export documents were presented for customs clearance. Since the destruction occurred before that stage and was due to unavoidable accident, the claim for remission could not be denied. The earlier view relied on by the Revenue was held not to govern the matter because it had not considered the relevant statutory provisions in the present context.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to remission and the duty demand could not be sustained.
Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Export goods destroyed in transit before customs presentation are not treated as finally removed for duty purposes, and remission of duty is available where destruction occurs due to unavoidable accident before the stage of export clearance.