Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2006 (3) TMI 399

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....work purposes. In this case the appellant purchased raw-materials and directed the supplier to deliver the raw-material to the job workers' place during the months of May to June, 1999. The appellant's factory declared lock out on 23-7-1999 and re-opened on 26-8-2002. The appellant subsequently contacted their job workers and got the intermediate product back from them in their factory in March and April, 2003. The appellant availed the Modvat credit on the inputs so delivered to the job workers in their statutory books. Show cause notice was issued to the appellant directing to show cause as to why such credit availed by them be incorrect and denied them and penalty imposed on them. The appellant contested the show cause notice. The adjudi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....have filed a declaration under Rule 57F(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. It was also submitted by him as they have filed a declaration under Rule 57F(3) the appellant should have followed proper procedure as laid down in the said Rule 57F(3). 5. Considered the submissions made by both sides and perused records. I find from the records that the appellant had filed declaration with the Jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of their factory regarding functioning under Rule 57F(3) under Notification No. 214/86 dated 25-3-1986. In that declaration I find that the appellant had categorically mentioned in one of the columns that raw-material will not be directly delivered to the job worker's place but they will be brought in the appel....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....availed were beyond the period of nine months from the date of issue, on the face of clear statutory provision, the appellant could not avail Modvat credit, even if their factory was under lock out. The appellant's contention on eligibility on Modvat credit fails and is liable to be dismissed and I do so. 7. The appellant's contention that the show cause notice issued to them does not invoke any provision of Central Excise Rules, 1944 but were issued under Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 does not help them, for the reason that the show cause notice, if read in totality indicates the violation of the rules, which does not entitle the appellant from availing the Modvat credit on the disputed invoices. Provisions of Central Excise Rules appl....