<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 399 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117558</link>
    <description>Modvat credit on inputs sent directly to job workers was disallowed because no declaration under Rule 57J was filed before the proper jurisdictional authority for the job workers&#039; premises, and the invoices were also beyond the nine-month limit under Rule 57G(5). The record showed only a declaration for the assessee&#039;s own factory and copies sent to the Superintendent, which was insufficient to establish operation under Rule 57J. Penalty, however, was set aside because the non-compliance was treated as a bona fide procedural lapse without deliberate intent to evade excise procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 10:14:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 399 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117558</link>
      <description>Modvat credit on inputs sent directly to job workers was disallowed because no declaration under Rule 57J was filed before the proper jurisdictional authority for the job workers&#039; premises, and the invoices were also beyond the nine-month limit under Rule 57G(5). The record showed only a declaration for the assessee&#039;s own factory and copies sent to the Superintendent, which was insufficient to establish operation under Rule 57J. Penalty, however, was set aside because the non-compliance was treated as a bona fide procedural lapse without deliberate intent to evade excise procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>