Just a moment...

Report
ReportReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Report an Error
Type of Error :
Please tell us about the error :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2006 (1) TMI 326

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nkhla, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : T.V. Sairam, Member (T) (for the Bench)]. - These two appeals are filed one by M/s. Choksi Contracts (P) Ltd. and the other by M/s. Choksi Platinum (P) Ltd. against the impugned orders of the Commissioner (Appeals) involving the same issue: whether the product 'silver palladium wire' containing 70% of silver and 30% of palladium could be covered unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er 7101 4. Poring over the structure of this tariff Heading and the description of Chapter Heading 7101.60, however, the contention appears outlandish. The learned counsel relies upon the Note No. 5 of Chapter 71 to state that any reference with regard to precious metals has to include a reference to alloys 5. Learned authorised representative of the Department (ARD) relies upon the fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r 71 of the Customs Tariff Schedule are the special features of the Customs Tariff Schedule which can not be found in Central Excise Tariff Schedule. He is of the view that ratio adopted in the decision based on the customs tariff schedule cannot be compared to the Central Excise Tariff Schedule although there is a common vein between them as they are cast on the Harmonized system of Nomenclature.....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eported to have paid Rupees two lakhs against the demand of Rs.7,59,415.35 which fact is accepted by the revenue. We, therefore, direct the appellant in this case to deposit 50% of the total duty demanded from them, which could be adjusted against the amount already paid by them. In the Appeal No. E/3588/05, the appellants are reported to have paid Rupees three lakhs against the demand of Rs. 12,1....