<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 326 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117202</link>
    <description>A classification dispute concerned whether silver palladium wire, made of 70% silver and 30% palladium, could be treated as silver wire under the Central Excise Tariff or was classifiable as &quot;others&quot; under the relevant heading. Reading Chapter 71 and the tariff description, the Tribunal noted that the entry for strips, wires, sheets, plates and foils of silver was confined to silver and silver-alloy items. On that basis, the appellants were found not to have shown a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. Full waiver was declined and partial pre-deposit relief was allowed, with earlier payments to be adjusted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:14:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=154200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 326 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117202</link>
      <description>A classification dispute concerned whether silver palladium wire, made of 70% silver and 30% palladium, could be treated as silver wire under the Central Excise Tariff or was classifiable as &quot;others&quot; under the relevant heading. Reading Chapter 71 and the tariff description, the Tribunal noted that the entry for strips, wires, sheets, plates and foils of silver was confined to silver and silver-alloy items. On that basis, the appellants were found not to have shown a strong prima facie case for complete waiver of pre-deposit. Full waiver was declined and partial pre-deposit relief was allowed, with earlier payments to be adjusted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=117202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>