2005 (9) TMI 425

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....umar, SDR, for the Appellant. S/Shri Vipin Jain and Vishal Agarwal, CAs, for the Respondent. [Order per : Moheb Ali M., Member (T)]. - These appeals are by the Revenue against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals), Pune. The respondents are manufacturers of optical fibre cables falling under Chapter Heading 8544 of the schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The appellants were....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... cable network and not in the cables themselves. He therefore held that the bought out items become part of the cable network but not of cables themselves. He observed that the bought out items neither become part of the cables nor any case has been made out for adding the value of the bought out items to the assessable value of the cables. The Revenue is aggrieved by these findings on the ground ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l the components named above and the cables are interconnected and therefore should be treated as one commodity for the purpose of assessment. It is also contended that the goods are classifiable under Chapter 85 and the value of all the bought out items should be included in the value of the cables when cleared from the factory. 2. Heard both sides. 3. The respondents contend that....