<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116680</link>
    <description>The value of bought-out items cleared along with optical fibre cables was not includible in the cables&#039; assessable value for central excise purposes because the items were neither parts nor accessories of the cables. Chapter notes on classification did not govern the valuation question, and there was no basis to add the value of external items to the cable value. The assessable value of the optical fibre cables therefore excluded the bought-out items.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:20:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 425 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116680</link>
      <description>The value of bought-out items cleared along with optical fibre cables was not includible in the cables&#039; assessable value for central excise purposes because the items were neither parts nor accessories of the cables. Chapter notes on classification did not govern the valuation question, and there was no basis to add the value of external items to the cable value. The assessable value of the optical fibre cables therefore excluded the bought-out items.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116680</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>