Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2005 (6) TMI 464

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. - These appeals have been directed against the common impugned order-in-appeal vide which the Commissioner (Appeals) has confirmed the confiscation of the seized gold bars and pieces and also the imposition of penalties on the appellants as detailed therein. 2. I have heard both the sides and gone through the records. 3. On Panka....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....abad of which Pankaj Kumar, appellant, at that time, was proprietor and the manager was Vinod Kumar. 4. From the record, it is also evident that the seizure of the gold bars, was initially made by the Income-tax authorities by carrying out the survey of the premises of M/s. Vardhaman Abhushan, Udaipur on 12-1-1999. But Pankaj Kumar, appellant, produced a fax copy of the bill no. 711, dated....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....0 gold bars of foreign origin, which were delivered to him by Mukesh Kumar for preparing the ornaments. But Mukesh Kumar, himself in his statements, one recorded on 22-2-1999 and another on 23-2-1999, admitted of having delivered 10 gold bars to Jayanti Lal, for preparation of ornaments. It is only in the third statement recorded on 24-9-1999, he allegedly denied this fact, but that statement was ....