<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 464 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116466</link>
    <description>The judgment allowed the appeals, setting aside the order confirming the confiscation of seized gold bars and penalties imposed on the appellants. It was determined that the appellants lawfully acquired and possessed the gold bars, with evidence supporting their innocence in smuggling activities. The decision highlighted the importance of authentic evidence and lawful acquisition in such cases, leading to the consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:24:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=153464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 464 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116466</link>
      <description>The judgment allowed the appeals, setting aside the order confirming the confiscation of seized gold bars and penalties imposed on the appellants. It was determined that the appellants lawfully acquired and possessed the gold bars, with evidence supporting their innocence in smuggling activities. The decision highlighted the importance of authentic evidence and lawful acquisition in such cases, leading to the consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=116466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>