2005 (4) TMI 469

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... N.K. Mishra, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - Heard Shri B.N. Chattopadhyay, Consultant for Appellant and Shri N.K. Mishra, JDR for Respondent. Prima facie the case is in favour of Appellant. Therefore, I waive the condition of pre-deposit and heard the appeal on merit. Mr. Chattopadhyay submits that the Commissioner disallowed the credit on M.S. Joist only on the ground that the goods h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r cover of proper duty paying documents in their factory on 2-2-96 and had been properly accounted for in their Books of Accounts. The said goods had been used in the factory in manufacture of dutiable goods. Therefore, he submits that the substantial benefit of Modvat should not be denied on technical grounds. In support of his argument, he relies on the decision in Grasim Industries Ltd. v. Comm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... receipt of goods in factory - Rule 57T(13) of erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 4 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 - Board's Circular No. 441/7/99-CX., dated 23-2-1999. Similar view was expressed by the Delhi Bench in case of Paharpur Plastics Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, Meerut reported in 2001 (136) E.L.T. 252 (Tri. - Del.) that the - Modvat on capital goods - Declaration de....