Modvat credit cannot be denied for a procedural delay in filing Rule 57T declaration when duty-paid goods are properly accounted for.

Modvat credit was treated as admissible where duty-paid inputs were received under proper documents, entered in the books, and used in manufacturing dutiable goods. Filing the Rule 57T declaration after receipt of the goods was regarded as a technical lapse, and substantive credit was not denied for that procedural default when the delay was capable of condonation under the rule. The Tribunal applied its discretion to condone the delay and accepted the assessee's entitlement to Modvat credit.

---

---

Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied solely because the declaration under Rule 57T was filed after receipt of the goods, and whether the delay was liable to be condoned.

Analysis: The goods were received under proper duty-paying documents, duly accounted for in the books, and used in the manufacture of dutiable goods. The delay in filing the declaration was treated as a technical lapse, and the Tribunal applied the principle that substantive Modvat benefit should not be denied on a mere procedural default. The discretion under Rule 57T was invoked to condone the delay.

Conclusion: The delay in filing the declaration was condoned and the assessee was held entitled to Modvat credit.

Ratio Decidendi: Where receipt and use of duty-paid goods are undisputed, Modvat credit cannot be denied for a procedural delay in filing the declaration if the delay is condonable under the applicable rule.

---