Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2005 (2) TMI 660

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....M. Rao, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. - The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. Wilway Fort India Ltd. is whether the Modvat credit of the duty paid on Evaporation Boat is available to them during the period May, 1992 to February, 1994. 2. Shri Mohan Lal, learned Advocate, submitted that Evaporation Boat (crucible) is a consumable and does not fall in the category of cap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... of Aluminium before it has to be replaced; that the boat is nothing but the inputs and the Appellants are eligible for the benefit of Modvat credit. He relied upon the decision in the case of Lohia Brass Pvt. Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut - 1998 (100) E.L.T. 356 (Tribunal), and CCE, Bhopal v. Bharat Zinc Ltd. - 2000 (119) E.L.T. 135 (Tribunal). 3. The learned DR Shri P.M. Rao, submitted that the Co....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the process of manufacture and as such stands excluded from the purview of the definition of the inputs at the material time. This was the view upheld by the Tribunal in the decision relied upon by the Commissioner in the impugned Order. The Larger Bench of the Tribunal has also held in the case of Melton India Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut - 2000 (121) E.L.T. 701 (T-LB) that the ceramic evaporation boat u....