Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on evaporation boat used in the manufacture of metallised polyester film was admissible as input under Rule 57A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
Analysis: Rule 57A allowed credit of duty paid on inputs, but its explanation excluded tools and appliances used for producing or processing goods or for bringing about any change in any substance in relation to manufacture. The evaporation boat was used in the metallisation process as part of the evaporation source within the metalliser and functioned as an appliance in manufacture. It therefore fell within the exclusion from the definition of inputs. The view was supported by the larger bench decision treating ceramic evaporation boats used in metallised plastic film manufacture as appliances and not inputs eligible for Modvat credit.
Conclusion: Modvat credit on the evaporation boat was not admissible and the issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed because the article in question was treated as an appliance used in manufacture and not as an eligible input for Modvat credit.
Ratio Decidendi: An item used as an appliance in the manufacturing process, and covered by the exclusion in the definition of inputs under Rule 57A, is not entitled to Modvat credit.