2004 (8) TMI 610

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt. Shri Sudeep Singh, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : Jyoti Balasundaram, Member (J)]. -  The respondents herein are engaged in job work for conversion of raw material i.e. semi-finished goods of iron and steel products supplied by Steel Authority of India Limited into finished goods, which are sold on behalf of the SAIL. Declarations were filed by them in Annexure-II Pro....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y other consideration flowing directly or indirectly as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ujagar Prints v. Union of India, 1989 (39) E.L.T. 493 (S.C.). On this basis 15 show cause notices involving central excise duty Rs. 35,91,315/- were issued which were adjudicated by the Assistant Commissioner who, after allowing deduction of element of Modvat involved on the inputs used in....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uld take in the value of the raw material and the conversion cost and the profits of job worker. It is not to include the profit of the merchant who finally sells the processed goods. In the present case, the goods were sold on behalf of SAIL and the appellants paid duty at the time of removal of goods on the sale price of SAIL. Thus, it is case where the assessable value included all the cost and....