2003 (12) TMI 570

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Appellant. Shri Sanjay Singhal, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. -  After dispensing with the condition of the pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,31,712/- and penalty of an equal amount, we proceed to dispose of the appeal itself with the consent of both the sides. 2. An amount of Rs. 1,05,053/- has been confirmed against the appellant on the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....2001 in which case the bar of limitation will apply inasmuch as the allegation of suppression and misstatement made against them are not sustainable. He also relies upon the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. reported in 1997 (94) E.L.T. 13 (S.C.) as also in the Tribunal's decision in the case of Empire Industries Ltd. - 1997 (95) E.L.T. 653 (T). 3.&emsp....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es below. 5. We have considered the submissions made by both the sides. In respect of first demand, we do not find any justification in the Revenue's findings that the assessable value of the sulphuric acid has been diverted to transportation charges which the appellant was collecting at Rs. 2 per MT i.e. only a small percentage from their customers. The appellant have given a justifiable ....