Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the amount collected at Rs. 2 per MT towards arranging transport of sulphuric acid was includible in the assessable value; (ii) whether the demand raised in respect of clearances at a lower value was barred by limitation.
Issue (i): Whether the amount collected at Rs. 2 per MT towards arranging transport of sulphuric acid was includible in the assessable value.
Analysis: The amount was collected only in a small percentage of cases where the assessee arranged transport for customers. The explanation that the charge related to special handling and training for transporting a hazardous commodity was accepted. Even if treated as transport-related consideration, it was not part of the assessable value for excise purposes.
Conclusion: The amount was not includible in the assessable value and the demand on this count was unsustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether the demand raised in respect of clearances at a lower value was barred by limitation.
Analysis: The demand covered a period already beyond the normal limitation and the invoices showing the lower clearance value had been filed with the Revenue. In the absence of non-disclosure, the extended period could not be invoked.
Conclusion: The demand was barred by limitation and was liable to be set aside.
Final Conclusion: The demand and the consequential penalty were set aside, resulting in relief to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Charges collected for transport arrangements are not includible in assessable value when they do not form part of the price of removal, and the extended limitation period cannot be invoked where the relevant invoices and valuation particulars were disclosed to the department.