2009 (1) TMI 492
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ENT Anoop V. Mohta, J. - The petitioner has challenged the order dated October 29, 2003, on exhibit 22 in Regular Civil Suit No. 156 of 1999, whereby the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Solapur has stayed the suit on an application filed by the defendant by invoking the provisions of section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, by holding that the suit for rec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r and subletting and also stated that respondent No. 1 company was declared a sick industrial company and suit could not be proceeded with. Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 adopted the written statement filed by respondent No. 3. 6. On April 24, 2000, the respondents made an application exhibit 22, for stay of the suit contending that the respondent-company was wound up and the receiver was appointed b....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....] 8 SCC 559 ; MANU/SC/3938/2007, considering the Maharashtra Rent Control Act and the same provision has observed as under (page 569) : "19. The courts were also right in relying upon Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. v. Church of South India Trust Association [1992] 75 Comp. Cas. 440 ; [1992] 3 SCC 1; MANU/SC/501/1992 and in holding that eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tena....
TaxTMI