<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 492 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114036</link>
    <description>The court set aside the order staying the suit under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, emphasizing that eviction proceedings against a sick company are maintainable under rent control legislation. The court found the stay contrary to the law, allowing the writ petition and ordering the setting aside of the impugned order without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 10:45:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=151042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 492 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114036</link>
      <description>The court set aside the order staying the suit under the Sick Industrial Companies Act, emphasizing that eviction proceedings against a sick company are maintainable under rent control legislation. The court found the stay contrary to the law, allowing the writ petition and ordering the setting aside of the impugned order without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=114036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>