Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2004 (7) TMI 514

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... per : P.G. Chacko, Member (J) (Oral)]. - This appeal of the assessee is against a demand of duty of Rs. 18,23,543/- on Compound Rubber for the period 1-3-1994 to 27-3-1994. Compound rubber is the assessee's intermediate product which is captively consumed in the manufacture of tyres. During the material period, ADV tyres, i.e., tyres for animal-drawn vehicles, were not dutiable and consequently....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the present appeal. 2. We have examined the records and heard both sides. In the Memorandum of Appeal, the appellants have taken a contention that Notification No. 74/94-C.E., dated 28-3-1994 is clarificatory and retrospective and hence the exemption from payment of duty was available to Compound Rubber captively consumed in the manufacture of ADV Tyres, during the above period. However, in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ken into account in the quantification of demand of duty. Counsel has also claimed, for the appellants, the benefit of a circular of the CBEC. Board's Circular No. 258/92/96-CX., dated 30-10-1996 had laid down that, for the purpose of determination of assessable value of captively consumed goods under Rule 6(b)(ii), "profit before tax" should be taken into account instead of "gross profit". It was....