https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113982 The Tribunal upheld the dutiability of Compound Rubber for the relevant period but set aside the duty demand due to erroneous quantification. The matter was remanded to the original authority for reevaluation, considering the appellant's claim for Modvat credit and adhering to the Board's Circular for determining the assessable value. The original authority was instructed to provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to present their case. As a result, the appeal was partly rejected and partly allowed through remand for proper quantification of duty. en-us Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 May 2012 16:04:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113982 The Tribunal upheld the dutiability of Compound Rubber for the relevant period but set aside the duty demand due to erroneous quantification. The matter was remanded to the original authority for reevaluation, considering the appellant's claim for Modvat credit and adhering to the Board's Circular for determining the assessable value. The original authority was instructed to provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to present their case. As a result, the appeal was partly rejected and partly allowed through remand for proper quantification of duty. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=113982