2003 (11) TMI 456

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Smt. Bhaghya Devi, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.L. Peeran, Member (J), (Oral)]. -  For the purpose of hearing this appeal, the appellants are required to pre-deposit duty amount of Rs. 45,71,951/-. The appellants had imported live animals like dolphins and sealions and declared themselves as 'Zoo' seeking classification under tariff heading 9908 at NIL rate of duty. The de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ase on merits as the term 'Zoo' requires to be gone in a larger sense and not in the sense in which the department has placed reliance. He has filed large number of documents to substantiate his case. He further submits that the appellants are faced with severe financial hardship and they have incurred a loss of Rs. 13.00 crores with a daily loss of Rs. 80,000/-. He submits that they are not in a ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....onsideration, prima facie it is not possible to come to a conclusion at this stage that the appellant is carrying a zoo in view of the clarification given by the Ministry of Environment and Forest. Prima facie, also in terms of common parlance test it could not be defined as zoo. However taking into consideration the financial hardship pleaded and records pertaining to their loss which is produced....