<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 456 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110745</link>
    <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the financial hardship claimed by the appellants importing live animals and directed them to pre-deposit Rs. 4.50 lakhs within three months, waiving the remaining duty and penalty amounts, and staying the recovery. The Tribunal recognized the potential hardship faced by the appellants, considering their significant financial losses. The appeal was set for an expedited hearing on a specified date, contingent upon compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 456 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110745</link>
      <description>The Tribunal acknowledged the financial hardship claimed by the appellants importing live animals and directed them to pre-deposit Rs. 4.50 lakhs within three months, waiving the remaining duty and penalty amounts, and staying the recovery. The Tribunal recognized the potential hardship faced by the appellants, considering their significant financial losses. The appeal was set for an expedited hearing on a specified date, contingent upon compliance with the deposit requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>