Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2003 (9) TMI 611

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ent. [Order]. - In this appeal which has been filed by the Revenue against the impugned Order-in-Appeal, the issue centres around the question as to whether the confiscation of the unaccounted goods lying in the factory premises of the respondents could be ordered or not after having been released provisionally to them during the adjudication proceedings. The adjudicating authority only imposed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....on could be ordered. 2. The learned Consultant on behalf of the respondents has referred to the ratio of law laid down in the case of Friends Wire Industries v. CCE, Chandigarh, 2003 (156) E.L.T. 218 (T) to contend that confiscation of the goods could not be ordered as unaccounted goods were not finished goods. But his contention cannot be accepted. The unaccounted goods were not found to be....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... the absence of intention to evade payment of duty could not warrant confiscation of the goods. This judgment was passed by relying upon the judgment in Bhillai Conductors (P) Ltd. v. CCE, 2000 (125) E.L.T. 781. But the ratio of law laid down, in that case cannot be given preference over the (Bombay High Court judgment in Kirloskar Brothers, 1988 (34) E.L.T. 30 (Bom.) = 2002 (83) ECC 497 wherein i....