<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110499</link>
    <description>The judge set aside the order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to determine the confiscation of goods and the payment of redemption fine by the respondents. The penalty imposed on the respondents remained unchanged, and the appeal of the Revenue was allowed. The adjudicating authorities were directed to make a decision after hearing both parties, based on the precedents set by the Apex Court and the Bombay High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:46:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 611 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110499</link>
      <description>The judge set aside the order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to determine the confiscation of goods and the payment of redemption fine by the respondents. The penalty imposed on the respondents remained unchanged, and the appeal of the Revenue was allowed. The adjudicating authorities were directed to make a decision after hearing both parties, based on the precedents set by the Apex Court and the Bombay High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>