Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 467

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dvat credit of the duty paid on the inputs can be availed of only if the inputs are received under the cover of duty paying documents; that the respondents had taken credit on the basis of invoices which did not contain entire information as required or were defective; that the Commissioner (Appeals) has listed such 15 short comings in the impugned Order; that some of the short comings are duplicate copy of invoice was of yellow colour instead of pink colour as required under Rule 57GG, the date and time of removal of goods not mentioned, duty per unit of goods not mentioned, rate of duty not mentioned, vehicle registration no not written in the invoice, invoices are written without using carbon paper, etc. He, further, submitted that the C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....fore, contended that as the invoices in question were not as prescribed by Notification, the respondents were not eligible to avail the Modvat credit. 3. Opposing the Appeal Shri M.P. Devnath, learned Advocate, submitted that it is not the case of the Revenue that the inputs mentioned in the invoice in question have not been received by the respondents; that further it has also not been alleged that appropriate duty has not been paid in respect of inputs received under the cover of the invoices in question; that all the discrepancies mentioned in the show cause notice are of technical nature which are also very minor in nature; that in their own case the Appellate Tribunal vide Final Order No. A-1293/2002-NB (S), dated 17-10-2002 has ....