<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that Modvat credit could not be denied solely based on procedural lapses in invoices when the essential requirements were met, and the duty paid nature of the goods was not in question. The decision highlighted the significance of ensuring duty payment and receipt of goods while considering Modvat credit claims, emphasizing that minor procedural issues should not be grounds for denial if the substantive aspects were fulfilled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appeal, ruling that Modvat credit could not be denied solely based on procedural lapses in invoices when the essential requirements were met, and the duty paid nature of the goods was not in question. The decision highlighted the significance of ensuring duty payment and receipt of goods while considering Modvat credit claims, emphasizing that minor procedural issues should not be grounds for denial if the substantive aspects were fulfilled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>