<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</link>
    <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the inputs were received and the duty-paid nature of the goods was undisputed, and the only objection was to technical or procedural defects in the invoices. The credit scheme required prescribed duty-paying documents and particulars, but the governing circular allowed minor lapses to be ignored when the essential conditions were satisfied. The cited Larger Bench ruling was distinguished because the duty-paying document itself was absent there, whereas valid invoices were available in this matter. The result was that procedural defects alone did not justify denial of credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:31:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 467 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</link>
      <description>Modvat credit could not be denied where the inputs were received and the duty-paid nature of the goods was undisputed, and the only objection was to technical or procedural defects in the invoices. The credit scheme required prescribed duty-paying documents and particulars, but the governing circular allowed minor lapses to be ignored when the essential conditions were satisfied. The cited Larger Bench ruling was distinguished because the duty-paying document itself was absent there, whereas valid invoices were available in this matter. The result was that procedural defects alone did not justify denial of credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>