Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 1138

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aring both sides the appeal itself was taken up for final disposal on granting waiver of pre-deposit of duty of Rs. 1,15,973/- and penalty of Rs. 15,000/-. 2. The confirmed duty was the result of denial of Modvat credit on the ground that the assessees do not submit the duplicate copies of the modvatable invoices. The assessees claimed that duplicate copies of the invoices had been presented....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the factory or warehouse; (ii)      the declaration filed under sub-rule (1) does not contain all the details required to be contained therein or the manufacturer fails to comply with any other requirements under sub-rule (1). Provided that the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise having jurisdiction over the factory of manufacturer intending to take credit is satisf....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Tribunal which directed an officer to perform the task as were directed to be performed by a senior authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) in the impugned order upheld the lower order expressing doubt about the loss of invoices and observing that out of the 100 invoices produced by the appellant there could be no reason to allege five invoices were lost in the Range office. 4. The facility ....