TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Modvat credit denied for missing invoices upheld by authorities, compliance with Rule 57G(11) crucial.</h1> The denial of Modvat credit due to missing duplicate copies of invoices was upheld by the Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals), resulting ... Modvat/Cenvat - Duty paying documents - Substitute documents - Strictures against Department Issues:1. Denial of Modvat credit due to missing duplicate copies of invoices.2. Interpretation of Rule 57G(11) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.3. Failure of authorities to establish the duty paid nature of goods.4. Compliance with appellate directions and executive instructions.Analysis:1. The issue at hand revolves around the denial of Modvat credit based on missing duplicate copies of invoices. The appellant claimed that the missing invoices led to the contested duty amount. The Assistant Commissioner and the Commissioner (Appeals) did not accept this plea, resulting in the confirmation of the demand.2. The interpretation of Rule 57G(11) was crucial in this case. The rule outlines conditions under which credit shall not be denied, emphasizing the importance of documents containing specific particulars. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed recourse to this rule, highlighting the necessity for authorities to establish the duty paid nature of goods.3. The failure of authorities to establish the duty paid nature of goods was a significant concern. The Dy. Commissioner did not deviate from the earlier logic and dismissed the suggestion of physical verification of goods. This failure to comply with the provisions of Rule 57G(11) and establish the duty paid nature of goods led to the appeal being allowed.4. Compliance with appellate directions and executive instructions played a pivotal role in the judgment. The facility of credit based on documents other than those prescribed was initially allowed by executive instructions. However, the power to accept substitute documents was later specifically given to the Assistant Commissioner under Rule 57G. The failure of authorities to comply with these directions and provisions led to the remand of proceedings for proper scrutiny of original documents.In conclusion, the judgment highlighted the importance of adhering to legal provisions, establishing the duty paid nature of goods, and complying with appellate directions to ensure fair treatment in matters of Modvat credit denial.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
