2002 (4) TMI 689

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplicant. Shri A.K. Jain, Advocate, for the Respondent. [Order per : P.S. Bajaj, Member (J)]. -  This order will dispose of two ROM, one filed by the Revenue (C/ROM/142/01-NB) and other by the assessee (C/ROM/113/01-NB). 2. The Revenue has filed ROM seeking rectification in the order passed in the earlier ROM of the assessee vide which the Tribunal ordered deletion of the fol....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....final order dated 29-10-99 was allowed and sentence reproduced above, was ordered to be deleted. That order was passed by the Tribunal after hearing both the sides. The ground taken up by the Revenue is that the above said sentence could not be deleted legally and as such, the order deserves to be again rectified. But this ground is not legally maintainable for allowing ROM of the Revenue and to o....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... merit in the ROM filed by the Revenue and the same is dismissed. 8. The second ROM bearing No. C/ROM/113/01-NB has been moved by the assessee seeking recall of the original final order on the ground that the observation of the Apex Court in the case of Chowgule & Co. (P) Ltd. v. Union of India - 1987 (28) E.L.T. 39, had escaped the notice of the Bench while deciding the appeal of the asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o whether the provisions of Section 15(1)(b) or 15(1)(c) were attracted to the case of the assessee for calculating the rate of duty. In Commissioner of Income-tax v. Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. and others - AIR 1998 S.C. 155, it has been observed by the Apex Court that on debatable question of fact or law, no ROM is maintainable. There must be a mistake glaring and obvious on the face of the order soug....